June 14th hearing thread: All discussion pertaining to todays hearing in this thread please

If we even get to a trial. I'm starting to believe Murray will never see a trial.
 
Could someone with knowledge about the CA legal system explain how the judge doesn't have jurisdiction to suspend his licence for me?

Then how is it that the other judge could restrict him from administering anaesthetics?
 
Then how is it that the other judge could restrict him from administering anaesthetics?

Here's an explanatory quote from the AP story:
Pastor said it would conflict with established case law to change Schwartz's ruling and would set him up as "a one-judge appellate court."
"There is oftentimes in the real world a belief that judges can make up the rules as they go through a case," Pastor said.
However, he said, the law mandates, "I do not have the ability to revisit a ruling by one of my colleagues."
Pastor told Deputy District Attorney General Trina Saunders the medical board had the option of holding an administrative hearing on the license. He also said she could appeal his ruling.
Pastor said he might revisit the issue if there was new information.

Story here: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gvcLH28ub3AyGjplQ256FNiOT6CQD9GBAGG80
 
June 14, 2010 Court Hearing

joejacksonx-large.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg
 
I still don't get it. Was there a ruling during the last court date I'm just lost.
 
Michael Jackson's family left court on Monday disappointed and angry over the judge's decision not to suspend Dr. Conrad Murray's medical license in California.

Outside the Los Angeles courthouse, Jackson's sister La Toya responded to the verdict by telling reporters: "It's not what we expected."

Tito, Katherine, and Joe Jackson were also in attendance. As they deparrted, Tito muttered profanities and Joe waved off reporters' questions with the dismissive statement, "You can read it in the papers."

The family's sour mood was no doubt due to Judge Michael Pastor's ruling not to take away Murray's medical license.

As RadarOnline.com previously reported, Judge Pastor refused to overturn the decision made by the last judge to hear the case, telling the court, "I don't have ability to revisit the actions of one of my colleagues. I do not have jurisdiction to revisit this matter. It doesn't have anything to do with how I feel or what I think. It has to do with the law and this court's ability to follow the law," Pastor said.

The Monday hearing in Los Angeles was the fourth time the office of California's attorney general, on behalf of the state's medical board, attempted to suspend Murray's medical license. Murray is also facing criminal charges in the death of Jackson.

Murray's defense said he has been in "absolute compliance" with the restrictions already placed on him (not using propofol and not practicing in California). They later brought up the recent incident of Murray helping a sick passenger during a flight as an example of Murray's continued use as a physician.

The prosecution countered saying Murray's actions were "egregious" and therefore the medical board does not want him using medical tools to continue practicing on the public.

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusiv...ts-conrad-murray-court-ruling-its-not-what-we
 
ridiculous. why is there so big gaps inbetween the dates. its a joke. how long do prelims last? a day? a week? __________________
it is easy to understand, the longer time has past the better, the people will forget about the whole case. There are happening too many other things meanwhile, it is not longer important. It is a so called delaying tactic. This works. As I told from the beginning ... justice will not be done. Not for Michael. Not on this planet.
 
Re: June 14, 2010 Court Hearing

This should really be in The Case section of the Seeking The Truth board.
 
Re: June 14, 2010 Court Hearing

I dont think this is entertainment hence shouldnt be posted in this section it should be posted in the case section, postin it in this section is macabre
 
If we even get to a trial. I'm starting to believe Murray will never see a trial.

I still believe that justice will be served.
It's no use losing hope now.. We need to go on.

Good on you. Janet just makes my blood boil.

Why so many attacks on Janet right now...... ... ?
She didn't say anything remotely related to drugs on her twitter yesterday
(if it really was her. she did not air anything family or trial related on her twitter before, which I thought respectful)

I think we should try to understand how the whole system works rather than jumping with accusations without proper research.
 
UPDATE 1:10 PM PT: Dr. Murray's medical license is SAFE!! The judge just said he did not have jurisdiction to suspend it.

Ugh.


The preliminary hearing date has been set for August 23.


Thanks.


Janet tweets :

Hey @randyjackson8, I want to tell u that I saw ur piece on cnn and I thought u were great!

It's time the fans know the truth and ur one of the very few I trust n doing so. I got ur back all the way bro, whatever u need. I love u!


Um those tweets sound HIGHLY suspicious. Janet doesn't post like that on her Twitter.
 
My feelings too. It just doesn't SOUND like her at all.
MAybe Randall hacked (or simply asked to log in) into her account and sent these tweets to himself in order to get the few Janet fans on his side. I too have to agree that she doesn't tweet like this, Randall on the other hand does though
 
I am pretty much still disgusted today as I was yesterday....these 3 states need to get on the same page as far as who is allowed to do what ..and get the ish done..enough is enough now...I am beginning to think that some judges are being paid off...it would not surprise me in the least....we have seen far to much corruption when it comes to Michael Jackson
 
so I just read off e! and I apologize in advance so forgive me if this is posted already- a judge is rejecting a decision to have Dr. Evil's lisense revoked.... and hes only barred from administering any drugs. ??
 
Re: June 14, 2010 Court Hearing

This should really be in The Case section of the Seeking The Truth board.
i posted in ithe family section because they were pics of the family and people wanted to see them at the court. the last cout fate i posted in that section the pics and no one complained so i didn't think there was a problem,but the mods have moved it anyways so its whatever.

008ql.jpg


003rqg.jpg


013vw.jpg
 
I find it wierd that this hearing has recieved nearly no media attention at all.

Hopefull, the prelims will get some attention. Maybe it's just because Murray gets to keep his license and that's all that was really said.

Anyways, does anyone know what they will be discussing at the next hearing? Will more evidence be handing over to Murray during the prelims or before?

I am pretty much still disgusted today as I was yesterday....these 3 states need to get on the same page as far as who is allowed to do what ..and get the ish done..enough is enough now...I am beginning to think that some judges are being paid off...it would not surprise me in the least....we have seen far to much corruption when it comes to Michael Jackson

yeah, i've always been fearing that. I don't have the video, but I remember Eddie Jones saying in his speech yesterday that someone from the last 2005 trial, that was involved with the case, is now in jail. But I forgot who he said it was. And he wants to make sure this case isn't tainted.
 
Last edited:
Anyways, does anyone know what they will be discussing at the next hearing?
the prelim starts

I would like to understand why the judge couldn't overrule and who can make this decision finally?
i find it strange that in his ruling he says he has no jurisdiction yet in the next breath says he may go back to it after the prelims happens. seems to me he doesnt want to do anything until and indictment is handed down
 
Back
Top