mariemarie
Guests
once again that show..................was a mess
with those words, I added another tag
once again that show..................was a mess
^OK...wannabestartingsomething, I still say they should be kissing the ground that Michael walks on, because they realize that they were nothing, and they are nothing without Michael. They should be welcoming Michael back and kissing his a** as much as they did Britney last night. Will they do that? Of course not. They won't have the privilege of even having Michael back on their show.
Again, it's ridiculous how they're worshipping Britney and putting her on this pedestal, when pop acts/artists like her and the others wouldn't even BE THERE if it weren't for acts like Michael, (along with Prince, Madonna, Janet, etc.)
And of course, wannabestartingsomething, you're right, they have no class. We get that. But I don't think they have to. It's a show for kids under 25 to watch. And young people apparently like this crap nowadays. I don't, but hey I'm old inside so maybe it's just me. :/
Well you see, that is your opinion. What I give are FACTS. The album flopped, you can call it good, no matter what - I like Brave by JLO the album but it flopped terribly. And why didn't she get any awards? Because she is not in the deal with MTV and that damn asshole Perez. Easy as that.
If it had been a hit, I'd say, ok - logically. (Cause nowadays hit doesn't necessarily equal good - most of the times it is quite the contrary...) But this way I can't understand how she DESERVED it.
Yes.i do agree that Britney seemed to give a cold shoulder vibe in that intro...something mtv has deserved for a long time. it seems she treated it as a business stop, and that's it.
I give a damn!
I don't CARE if she is BRITNEY SPEARS - SHE DID NOT DESERVE THE AWARD.
PIECE OF ME?
Come on, be realistic - was it a hit? Was the album a hit?
She deserves it? No she doesn't. Not for this album/song at least. Props to her for her earlier hits, but this album SUCKS SO BAD that she rushed to make it, and made it in like 2 months,and now is making a new one. They gave her the award just so they could her bring her back in the positive spotlight and make her look normal. And NO it's NOT OK, cuz they've been giving Michael the hardest of times - what about what HE deserved? None of those poor rap T-Pain T.I. T-Rex, T-MILLION or whatever wouldn't even have BEEN there if that very same Michael Jackson hadn't achieved what he had in music. They kick him all the time, and it's like they took over their throne, instead of praising him for making pop music and MTV so big.
So once again I don't CARE who DESERVED what! Not anymore! Cause they don't care. What about all those brilliant bands and artists that TRULY deserved to win various of awards and DIDN'T because they are NOT BRITNEY SPEARS. And if it's the measurement of success nowadays to come to the awards riding an ELEPHANT and acting like a complete IDIOT then I am glad these bands are "unsuccessful".
So if you don't admit that this was all a setup in Britney's honor, then you are brain-washed as well!
END OF STORY!
If anyone can look at that pathetic display of what the industry has to offer today and not say music isn't as good as it used to be or denie that the standards have dropped to a hellish level, then they're either deaf, dumb, blind, all three or just plain stupid.
Britney Spears may appear to be in the same position as Michael, with the media lambasting her for the past two years, but make no mistake, she never was and never will be in the same situation as Michael. It only appears that way on the surface, but what's happened to Michael and the way he's been treated for the past 25 years runs so much deeper and has so much more to do with human nature then anything Britney's gone through. That's why Britney is being accepted again. With her it's a simple case of wanting to build her up to knock her down and then show that they have the power to build her up again. With Michael, the way he's treated is out of a lack of understanding what and who he is, fear because of that misunderstanding and inability to define him and an inability to relate to him.
It could be considered a flop had Britney of been in good health and actually promoted the album but she didn't and it still sold millions.
LMAFO!!!!lol but seriously how many T's are out there?
EXPECT IN THE NEXT ISSUE OF MTVSUX.COM - THE LONG LOST BROTHER OF VANILLA ICE - ICE T!
lol but seriously how many T's are out there?
EXPECT IN THE NEXT ISSUE OF MTVSUX.COM - THE LONG LOST BROTHER OF VANILLA ICE - ICE T!
T-MILLION & T-REX OMG. LMFAOOO. :hysterical:
I'd Rather just forget the whole thing ever happened...
Her voice is amazing, omg!CHRISTINA WAS FANTASTIC
btw, does anybody know where i can download the mp3 of her new version of Genie In A Bottle?
God, that was the highlight of the show for me.
Ain't it insane?! :lol: And, when one of the reporters asked Perez if Britney really deserved to win all those awards, he said something to the effect of, "You know, I just felt like she needed it this year, I feel like this is the year of Britney's comeback." So, he admitted that he voted for Britney based on the fact that she's trying to getting her life back together after a mess of a year prior. At least we finally have 100% confirmation that the VMA awards are not selected based on musical merit at all. I'm sure that the Britney-given awards were a bribe, "If you come back and introduce the show so that we can hype up your appearance endlessly beforehand, we can assure that you'll win all three awards, and here's a few million bucks while we're at it."Just imagine, a gossip bitch known as Perez Hilton on the "committe" to pick who wins these shitty awards. This clown is not a music critic. This clown is not a musician. He is a music fan like anyone else. Like anyone else, he has a bias. People literally rely on this fool to tell them what is considered "hot" or "music" of today. This is how gossip blogs have almost taken over anything credible. However, the VMAs have been uncredible for years and years. It just bothers you to a core, esp. when Perez's job is to bash people for a living.
Christina was the only talented one on the show. P!nk is talented, but nothing special.
But Christina's performance showed ONE of the problems with the industry. She was dancing. She was dancing so much she had to lip sync. Where's the problem you ask? Well... Christina isn't a dancer, she's a singer. You want to see her live to hear her sing, not see her dance. But see, and I alway say it's because Michael is so freakishly talented being a world class vocalist and dancer that the industry thought in order to compete they had to produce singer/dancers, the problem is, there's never been anyone besides Michael who was the best at both. That combination isn't just rare, it's once in forever, yet the industry feels as though they have to produce jacks of all trades, masters of none, and so the standard now is that everyone has to dance, EVERYONE, even if they can't, or they have to sing, even if they can't. Christina shouldn't be dancing, not in any serious capacity or to the point in which it compromises her singing. She isn't good enough at dancing for that crap. Just like Chris Brown shouldn't be singing. He should be on some dance crew somewhere.
Ain't it insane?! :lol: And, when one of the reporters asked Perez if Britney really deserved to win all those awards, he said something to the effect of, "You know, I just felt like she needed it this year, I feel like this is the year of Britney's comeback." So, he admitted that he voted for Britney based on the fact that she's trying to getting her life back together after a mess of a year prior. At least we finally have 100% confirmation that the VMA awards are not selected based on musical merit at all. I'm sure that the Britney-given awards were a bribe, "If you come back and introduce the show so that we can hype up your appearance endlessly beforehand, we can assure that you'll win all three awards, and here's a few million bucks while we're at it."
Perez Hilton was an absolute NOBODY just three years ago, he had just started his online blog of trashing celebrities and had zero visitors, zero comments, nothing at all. Suddenly, he's an official chairperson of the VMA committee and is responsible for deciding which musical artist gets which award. What a joke!
If only other artists would realize the many falsehoods of the VMAs, and refuse to attend their show, the event would cease to exist as it should have years ago. It isn't just piracy leading to the death of music, it is the lack of originality, the lack of respect that music outlets give to artists, and the lack of genuine entertainment. Will.i.am was right, the music industry is in dire need of a "jolt" and there's perhaps only one person who can bring it back.
Her voice is amazing, omg!
T-Pain's a moron coming in with that elephant. What the hell was that?
with those words, I added another tag
Christina was the only talented one on the show. P!nk is talented, but nothing special.
But Christina's performance showed ONE of the problems with the industry. She was dancing. She was dancing so much she had to lip sync. Where's the problem you ask? Well... Christina isn't a dancer, she's a singer. You want to see her live to hear her sing, not see her dance. But see, and I alway say it's because Michael is so freakishly talented being a world class vocalist and dancer that the industry thought in order to compete they had to produce singer/dancers, the problem is, there's never been anyone besides Michael who was the best at both. That combination isn't just rare, it's once in forever, yet the industry feels as though they have to produce jacks of all trades, masters of none, and so the standard now is that everyone has to dance, EVERYONE, even if they can't, or they have to sing, even if they can't. Christina shouldn't be dancing, not in any serious capacity or to the point in which it compromises her singing. She isn't good enough at dancing for that crap. Just like Chris Brown shouldn't be singing. He should be on some dance crew somewhere.
The best part of the whole night was Britney acting surprised when she won the awards.
i was hopin it got scared and trashed everything....:blink:
Christina was the only talented one on the show. P!nk is talented, but nothing special.
But Christina's performance showed ONE of the problems with the industry. She was dancing. She was dancing so much she had to lip sync. Where's the problem you ask? Well... Christina isn't a dancer, she's a singer. You want to see her live to hear her sing, not see her dance. But see, and I alway say it's because Michael is so freakishly talented being a world class vocalist and dancer that the industry thought in order to compete they had to produce singer/dancers, the problem is, there's never been anyone besides Michael who was the best at both. That combination isn't just rare, it's once in forever, yet the industry feels as though they have to produce jacks of all trades, masters of none, and so the standard now is that everyone has to dance, EVERYONE, even if they can't, or they have to sing, even if they can't. Christina shouldn't be dancing, not in any serious capacity or to the point in which it compromises her singing. She isn't good enough at dancing for that crap. Just like Chris Brown shouldn't be singing. He should be on some dance crew somewhere.
Just imagine, a gossip bitch known as Perez Hilton on the "committe" to pick who wins these shitty awards. This clown is not a music critic. This clown is not a musician. He is a music fan like anyone else. Like anyone else, he has a bias. People literally rely on this fool to tell them what is considered "hot" or "music" of today. This is how gossip blogs have almost taken over anything credible. However, the VMAs have been uncredible for years and years. It just bothers you to a core, esp. when Perez's job is to bash people for a living.